Target Corporation v. John Ko
This text of Target Corporation v. John Ko (Target Corporation v. John Ko) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order entered June 11, 2014
In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-14-00502-CV
TARGET CORPORATION, Appellant
V.
JOHN KO, Appellee
On Appeal from the 134th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-13-04853
ORDER Appellant filed its notice of appeal on April 24, 2014 of an interlocutory order. The
clerk’s record was filed on May 14, 2014. On May 19, 2014, the trial court signed an amended
order denying appellant’s motion for summary judgment and granting permission to appeal the
interlocutory amended order. Appellant filed an amended notice of appeal and petition for
appeal on June 2, 2014. On June 4, 2014, the clerk’s office of this Court inadvertently sent
appellant notice that its brief was past due. In response, appellant tendered its brief and filed a
motion for an extension of time to file its brief on June 10, 2014.
Appellant’s brief is not yet due because this Court has not yet ruled on its petition for
appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 28.3. Nevertheless, we GRANT appellant’s motion for an extension of time to file a brief. We ORDER the brief tendered to this Court by appellant on June 10,
2014 filed as of the date of this order.
Any response to appellant’s petition for review is due by June 12, 2014. See TEX. R.
APP. P. 28.3(f). Appellee’s brief on the merits will be due twenty days after any order of this
Court granting appellant’s petition for review.
/s/ ADA BROWN JUSTICE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Target Corporation v. John Ko, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/target-corporation-v-john-ko-texapp-2014.