Tappin v. Frazier

District Court, D. Nevada·Decided June 15, 2023·No. 3:22-cv-00570·Unknown

Opinion

1 2 3 4

5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 8 CELESTIN GLENN TAPPIN, JR., Case No.: 3:22-cv-00570-ART-CSD

9 Petitioner Order Screening Petition and Granting Motion for Counsel 10 v.

11 WARDEN FRAZIER, et al.,

12 Respondents.

13 Celestin Glenn Tappin, Jr. has submitted a pro se 28 U.S.C. § 2254 14 petition for a writ of habeas corpus and has now paid the filing fee. (ECF Nos. 15 1-1, 4.) The Court has reviewed the petition pursuant to Rule 4 of the Rules 16 Governing Habeas Corpus Cases Under Section 2254 and directs that it be 17 served on Respondents. 18 A petition for federal habeas corpus should include all claims for relief of 19 which petitioner is aware. If Petitioner fails to include such a claim in his 20 petition, he may be forever barred from seeking federal habeas relief upon that 21 claim. See 28 U.S.C. §2244(b) (successive petitions). If Petitioner is aware of 22 any claim not included in his petition, he should notify the court of that as 23 1 soon as possible, perhaps by means of a motion to amend his petition to add 2 the claim. 3 Tappin has also submitted a motion for appointment of counsel. (ECF 4 No. 1-2.) There is no constitutional right to appointed counsel in a federal

5 habeas corpus proceeding. Luna v. Kernan, 784 F.3d 640, 642 (9th Cir. 2015) 6 (citing Lawrence v. Florida, 549 U.S. 327, 336–37 (2007)). Whenever the court 7 determines that the interests of justice so require, counsel may be appointed to 8 any financially eligible person who is seeking habeas corpus relief. 18 U.S.C. § 9 3006A(a)(2)(B). “[T]he district court must evaluate the likelihood of success on 10 the merits as well as the ability of the petitioner to articulate his claims pro se 11 in light of the complexity of the legal issues involved.” Weygandt v. Look, 718 12 F.2d 952, 954 (9th Cir. 1983). Here, Tappin states in his petition that a jury 13 convicted him of several violent crimes, including attempted murder, and that 14 he is serving a term of 16-40 years in prison. It is unclear whether the legal 15 issues he seeks to raise are complex. In order to ensure due process, the Court 16 grants Tappin’s motion for counsel. 17 It is therefore ordered that the Clerk of Court file and electronically 18 SERVE the petition (ECF No. 1-1) on the Respondents. 19 It is further ordered that the Clerk add Aaron D. Ford, Nevada Attorney 20 General, as counsel for Respondents and provide Respondents an electronic 21 copy of all items previously filed in this case by regenerating the Notice of 22 Electronic Filing to the office of the AG only. 23 1 It is further ordered that the Clerk detach and file the motion for 2||appointment of counsel (ECF No. 1-2). 3 It is further ordered that Petitioner’s motion for appointment of counsel 4) is GRANTED. 5 It is further ordered that the Federal Public Defender for the District of Nevada (“FPD”) is appointed to represent Petitioner. 7 It is further ordered that the Clerk electronically serve the FPD a copy of this order, together with a copy of the petition for writ of habeas corpus (ECF 1-1). The FPD has 30 days from the date of entry of this order to file a 10 notice of appearance or to indicate to the Court its inability to represent petitioner in these proceedings. It is further ordered that after counsel has appeared for Petitioner in this 13 case, the Court will issue a scheduling order, which will, among other things, set a deadline for the filing of an amended petition. DATED: 15t of June 2023 16 ) en 17 Aros / ANNE R. TRAUM 18 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 19 20 21 22 23

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Tappin v. Frazier, (D. Nev. 2023).

Tappin v. Frazier (Tappin v. Frazier) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lawrence v. Florida
549 U.S. 327 (Supreme Court, 2007)
Benito Luna v. Scott Kernan
784 F.3d 640 (Ninth Circuit, 2015)