FEDERAL · 18 U.S.C.
Special Provisions when United States is a Receiving State
18 U.S.C. § 9
This text of 18 U.S.C. § 9 (Special Provisions when United States is a Receiving State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
18 U.S.C. § 9.
Text
Notwithstanding any provision of the agreement on detainers to the contrary, in a case in which the United States is a receiving State—
(1)any order of a court dismissing any indictment, information, or complaint may be with or without prejudice. In determining whether to dismiss the case with or without prejudice, the court shall consider, among others, each of the following factors: The seriousness of the offense; the facts and circumstances of the case which led to the dismissal; and the impact of a reprosecution on the administration of the agreement on detainers and on the administration of justice; and
(2)it shall not be a violation of the agreement on detainers if prior to trial the prisoner is returned to the custody of the sending State pursuant to an order of the appropriate co
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Melvin Turner v. United States
183 F.3d 474 (Sixth Circuit, 1999)
United States v. Ivezaj
568 F.3d 88 (Second Circuit, 2009)
United States v. Joseph Bryant, John Cagnina, Terry Lee Alvarez
671 F.2d 450 (Eleventh Circuit, 1982)
Alix v. McKinsey & Co., Inc.
23 F.4th 196 (Second Circuit, 2022)
United States v. Charles F. Burke, Jr., United States of America v. Alan Peter Quin
716 F.2d 935 (First Circuit, 1983)
United States v. Callan
22 F. App'x 434 (Sixth Circuit, 2001)
United States v. Newball
524 F. Supp. 715 (E.D. New York, 1981)
United States v. Motto Franicevich
465 F.2d 467 (Fifth Circuit, 1972)
United States v. Barkley
369 F. Supp. 2d 1309 (N.D. Oklahoma, 2005)
United States v. Burke
540 F. Supp. 1282 (D. Puerto Rico, 1982)
United States v. Anthony D'Ambrosio
105 F.4th 533 (Third Circuit, 2024)
United States ex rel. Campbell v. Hill
72 F.2d 549 (Third Circuit, 1934)
United States v. Zenon-Encarnacion
185 F. Supp. 2d 127 (D. Puerto Rico, 2001)
Sears v. Las Vegas Metro Police Department
(D. Nevada, 2019)
United States v. John Robert Hasson, a.k.a. Heloneti Glaera, a.k.a. Jack Hasson
(Eleventh Circuit, 2003)
Greater Oceans, Inc. v. Eric Thorstenson
(C.D. California, 2024)
Teetex LLC v. Zeetex, LLC
(N.D. California, 2022)
Evans Hotel, LLC v. Unite Here! Local 30
(S.D. California, 2022)
Metro Services Group v. Travelers Caualty and Surety Company of America
(N.D. California, 2021)
Ji v. Naver Corporation
(N.D. California, 2022)
Source Credit
History
(Pub. L. 91–538, §9, as added Pub. L. 100–690, title VII, §7059, Nov. 18, 1988, 102 Stat. 4403.)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
18 U.S.C. § 9, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/18/9.