Tapper v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Tapper v. State

63 So. 3d 879, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 8941, 2011 WL 2330860

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJune 15, 2011

Docket4D10-947

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 63 So. 3d 879 (Tapper v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Tapper v. State, 63 So. 3d 879, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 8941, 2011 WL 2330860 (Fla. Ct. App. 2011).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellant, Lori Tapper (hereinafter “defendant”), appeals revocation of her probation after the trial court found that she violated its terms by using intoxicants to excess not prescribed by a physician. We find no abuse of discretion in the trial court finding and determining valid grounds to revoke defendant’s probation. However, a formal, written order of revo *880 cation of probation is required pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.995. See Green v. State, 23 So.3d 820, 821 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009). We affirm the revocation of probation and subsequent sentence, but remand the case for the trial court to enter a written order of revocation of probation.

MAY, DAMOORGIAN and CONNER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The appellant, Lori Tapper (hereinafter “defendant”), appeals revocation of her probation after the trial court found that she violated its terms by using intoxicants to excess not prescribed by a physician. We find no abuse of discretion in the trial court finding and determining valid grounds to revoke defendant’s probation. However, a formal, written order of revo *880 cation of probation is required pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.995. See Green v. State, 23 So.3d 820, 821 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009). We affirm the revocation of probation and subsequent sentence, but remand the case for the trial court to enter a written order of revocation of probation.

MAY, DAMOORGIAN and CONNER, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

63 So. 3d 879, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 8941, 2011 WL 2330860, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tapper-v-state-fladistctapp-2011.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack