McDonald v. FLORIDA UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COMMISSION

63 So. 3d 879, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 8780, 2011 WL 2305621
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJune 13, 2011
Docket1D11-0823
StatusPublished

This text of 63 So. 3d 879 (McDonald v. FLORIDA UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COMMISSION) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McDonald v. FLORIDA UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COMMISSION, 63 So. 3d 879, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 8780, 2011 WL 2305621 (Fla. Ct. App. 2011).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Emily McDonald appeals an order of the Unemployment Appeals Commission affirming an appeals referee’s decision finding her to be disqualified from the receipt of unemployment compensation benefits. In a motion to relinquish jurisdiction, the Unemployment Appeals Commission forthrightly acknowledges that the proceedings before the referee did not fully comport with the requirements of an administrative rule governing the matter. The Commission therefore requests that the court relinquish jurisdiction to it for purposes of issuing an order remanding the case to the referee for further proceedings. In accordance with this request, the final order of the Unemployment Appeals Commission being appealed herein is reversed, and the matter is remanded for further proceedings.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

BENTON, C.J., HAWKES and CLARK, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Tapper v. State
63 So. 3d 879 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
63 So. 3d 879, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 8780, 2011 WL 2305621, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcdonald-v-florida-unemployment-appeals-commission-fladistctapp-2011.