Tapp v. Tapp

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Tapp v. Tapp

202 A.D.2d 679, 612 N.Y.S.2d 873, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2907

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 28, 1994

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 202 A.D.2d 679 (Tapp v. Tapp) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Tapp v. Tapp, 202 A.D.2d 679, 612 N.Y.S.2d 873, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2907 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

—In a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 4, the father appeals from an order of the Family Court, Suffolk County (McNulty, J.), entered March 24, 1992, confirming an order of the same court (Silver-man, H.E.), entered January 24, 1992 which, inter alia, granted the mother’s petition for an upward modification of child support.

Ordered that the order entered March 24, 1992, is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

We find that a de novo determination of the father’s child support obligations pursuant to the Child Support Standards [680]*680Act (see, Domestic Relations Law § 240; Family Ct Act § 413), was warranted since there were persuasive allegations that the children’s needs were not being met (see, Matter of Fetherston v Fetherston, 172 AD2d 831).

We have examined the appellant’s remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Thompson, J. P., Santucci, Krausman and Florio, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 4, the father appeals from an order of the Family Court, Suffolk County (McNulty, J.), entered March 24, 1992, confirming an order of the same court (Silver-man, H.E.), entered January 24, 1992 which, inter alia, granted the mother’s petition for an upward modification of child support.

Ordered that the order entered March 24, 1992, is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

We find that a de novo determination of the father’s child support obligations pursuant to the Child Support Standards [680]*680Act (see, Domestic Relations Law § 240; Family Ct Act § 413), was warranted since there were persuasive allegations that the children’s needs were not being met (see, Matter of Fetherston v Fetherston, 172 AD2d 831).

We have examined the appellant’s remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Thompson, J. P., Santucci, Krausman and Florio, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

202 A.D.2d 679, 612 N.Y.S.2d 873, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2907, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tapp-v-tapp-nyappdiv-1994.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack