Tanzi v. Florida

139 S. Ct. 478, 202 L. Ed. 2d 389
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided November 13, 2018·No. No. 18–5160.·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Florida denied. Justice THOMAS, concurring in the denial of certiorari: I concur for the reasons set out in Reynolds v. Florida, 586 U.S. ----, 139 S.Ct. 27, ---L.Ed.2d ---- (2018) (Thomas, J., concurring). Justice SOTOMAYOR, dissenting from the denial of certiorari: I *479dissent for the reasons set out in Reynolds v. Florida, 586 U.S. ----, 139 S.Ct. 27, --- L.Ed.2d ---- (2018) (Sotomayor, J., dissenting).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Tanzi v. Florida, 139 S. Ct. 478, 202 L. Ed. 2d 389 (U.S. 2018).

139 S. Ct. 478 (Tanzi v. Florida) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anderson v. Florida
140 S. Ct. 291 (Supreme Court, 2019)
Lowe v. Florida
139 S. Ct. 2717 (Supreme Court, 2019)
Everett v. Florida
139 S. Ct. 2019 (Supreme Court, 2019)
Bucklew v. Precythe
587 U.S. 119 (Supreme Court, 2019)
Hall v. Florida
139 S. Ct. 1179 (Supreme Court, 2019)
Crain v. Florida
139 S. Ct. 947 (Supreme Court, 2019)
John Loveman Reese v. State of Florida
261 So. 3d 1246 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2019)