Tanya Svoboda v. Amazon.com Inc.
This text of Tanya Svoboda v. Amazon.com Inc. (Tanya Svoboda v. Amazon.com Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit Chicago, Illinois 60604
March 6, 2026
Before
ILANA DIAMOND ROVNER, Circuit Judge
DAVID F. HAMILTON, Circuit Judge
MICHAEL Y. SCUDDER, Circuit Judge
No. 25-1361
TANYA V. SVOBODA AND ANTONELLA M. Appeal from the United States District ORTIZ COLOSI, Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Plaintiffs-Appellees, Eastern Division.
v. No. 1:21-cv-05336
AMAZON.COM AND AMAZON.COM Jorge L. Alonso, SERVICES, LLC, Judge. Defendants-Appellants.
ORDER
On consideration of the petition for rehearing and rehearing en banc, no judge 1 in active service requested a vote on the petition for rehearing en banc and all members of the original panel have voted to deny rehearing and to issue an amended opinion. We added the following language on page 17: “The district court was also on solid ground in observing that it retained discretion on a finding of liability to award
1 Judge St. Eve, Judge Lee, and Judge Kolar did not participate in the consideration of this petition. No. 25-1361 Page 2
damages on a classwide basis by, for example, assessing the amount of damages on a common per-scan basis.” The court’s opinion dated December 17, 2025, is amended in a separately filed opinion released today.
It is, therefore, ORDERED that rehearing and rehearing en banc are DENIED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Tanya Svoboda v. Amazon.com Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tanya-svoboda-v-amazoncom-inc-ca7-2026.