Tantum v. Binz
452 A.2d 667, 91 N.J. 426, 1982 N.J. LEXIS 2193
Opinion
The judgment of the Appellate Division is reversed, substantially for the reasons expressed in the dissenting opinion of Judge Botter, reported at 186 N.J.Super. 296, 302 (1981).
For reversal — Chief Justice WILENTZ and Justices CLIFFORD, SCHREIBER, HANDLER, POLLOCK and O’HERN —6.
For affirmance —None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Tantum v. Binz, 452 A.2d 667, 91 N.J. 426, 1982 N.J. LEXIS 2193 (N.J. 1982).
452 A.2d 667 (Tantum v. Binz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Henry v. New Jersey Department of Human Services
9 A.3d 882 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 2010)
Lanziano v. Cocoziello
701 A.2d 754 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1997)
Eagle Fire v. FIRST INDEM. INS.
655 A.2d 939 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1995)
Allstate Ins. Co. v. Coven
624 A.2d 594 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1993)
PT & L. CONST. v. Dept. of Transp.
531 A.2d 1330 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1987)
P.T. & L. Construction Co. v. State, Department of Transportation
531 A.2d 1330 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1987)
Lawrence v. Matusewski
509 A.2d 327 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1986)
Mazakas v. Wray
500 A.2d 1085 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1985)
D & K Landscaping Co. v. Great American Insurance
467 A.2d 581 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1983)
Tantum v. Binz
452 A.2d 667 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1981)