Tannenbaum v. Superior Court

252 P.2d 54, 115 Cal. App. 2d 394, 1953 Cal. App. LEXIS 1673
CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal
DecidedJanuary 16, 1953
DocketCrim. No. 2900; Crim. No. 2901; Civ. No. 15673; Civ. No. 15674
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 252 P.2d 54 (Tannenbaum v. Superior Court) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Tannenbaum v. Superior Court, 252 P.2d 54, 115 Cal. App. 2d 394, 1953 Cal. App. LEXIS 1673 (Cal. Ct. App. 1953).

Opinion

THE COURT.

The petitions for writs of habeas corpus are denied.

The court is of the opinion that the rule of People v. Talle, 111 Cal.App.2d 650 [245 P.2d 633], applying Statutes of 1871, page 319, was not here violated. (See, generally, In re Lemon, 15 Cal.App.2d 82 [59 P.2d 213]; United States v. Price, 163 F. 904.) We are further of the view that the testimony of an accomplice is sufficient upon which to indict as it is to hold to answer. (People v. McRae, 31 Cal.2d 184 [187 P.2d 741].) The other points raised do not necessitate discussion. The petitions for writs of prohibition are denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Wyatt
448 P.2d 827 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1968)
People v. Singer
217 Cal. App. 2d 743 (California Court of Appeal, 1963)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
252 P.2d 54, 115 Cal. App. 2d 394, 1953 Cal. App. LEXIS 1673, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tannenbaum-v-superior-court-calctapp-1953.