Tannenbaum v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Tannenbaum v. Superior Court

252 P.2d 54, 115 Cal. App. 2d 394, 1953 Cal. App. LEXIS 1673

California Court of Appeal·Decided January 16, 1953·No. Crim. No. 2900; Crim. No. 2901; Civ. No. 15673; Civ. No. 15674·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

THE COURT.

The petitions for writs of habeas corpus are denied.

The court is of the opinion that the rule of People v. Talle, 111 Cal.App.2d 650 [245 P.2d 633], applying Statutes of 1871, page 319, was not here violated. (See, generally, In re Lemon, 15 Cal.App.2d 82 [59 P.2d 213]; United States v. Price, 163 F. 904.) We are further of the view that the testimony of an accomplice is sufficient upon which to indict as it is to hold to answer. (People v. McRae, 31 Cal.2d 184 [187 P.2d 741].) The other points raised do not necessitate discussion. The petitions for writs of prohibition are denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

THE COURT.

The petitions for writs of habeas corpus are denied.

The court is of the opinion that the rule of People v. Talle, 111 Cal.App.2d 650 [245 P.2d 633], applying Statutes of 1871, page 319, was not here violated. (See, generally, In re Lemon, 15 Cal.App.2d 82 [59 P.2d 213]; United States v. Price, 163 F. 904.) We are further of the view that the testimony of an accomplice is sufficient upon which to indict as it is to hold to answer. (People v. McRae, 31 Cal.2d 184 [187 P.2d 741].) The other points raised do not necessitate discussion. The petitions for writs of prohibition are denied.

Tannenbaum v. Superior Court, 252 P.2d 54, 115 Cal. App. 2d 394, 1953 Cal. App. LEXIS 1673 (Cal. Ct. App. 1953).

Pincite

252 P.2d 54 (Tannenbaum v. Superior Court) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related