Tannehill v. Thomas

1 Blackf. 144, 1821 Ind. LEXIS 13
Indiana Supreme Court·Decided November 8, 1821·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Blackford, J.

This judgment is not regularly on demurrer or by default. But supposing that to have been the case, the final judgment should not have been rendered without awarding a writ of inquiry. Where judgments on demurrer or by default are for the plaintiff, in actions on promissory notes and bills of exchange, or on covenants for the payment of a sum certain, the damages may be assessed without the intervention of a jury; because, in such cases, the quantum of damages depends upon figures, and if the calculation be correct, the result must be the same whether the assessment be made by the Court or by a jury, Doug. 315. — 1 H. Bl. 252, 529, 541. — 4 T. R. 275

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Tannehill v. Thomas, 1 Blackf. 144, 1821 Ind. LEXIS 13 (Ind. 1821).

1 Blackf. 144 (Tannehill v. Thomas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State ex rel. Abrahams v. Cross
6 Ind. 387 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1855)
Stanton v. Henderson
1 Ind. 69 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1848)
McKay v. Craig
6 Blackf. 168 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1842)