McKay v. Craig

6 Blackf. 168
CourtIndiana Supreme Court
DecidedMay 15, 1842
StatusPublished

This text of 6 Blackf. 168 (McKay v. Craig) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McKay v. Craig, 6 Blackf. 168 (Ind. 1842).

Opinion

THE declaration in a suit on a delivery bond, stated the condition of the bond to be for the delivery of the goods on the twentieth of June, 1840, at the farm of D. McKay. The condition of the bond, as shown on oyer, was for the delivery of the goods on the second of June, 1840, at the house of said McKay. Held, on general demurrer to the declaration, that the variance was fatal. 1 Chitt. Pl., 305, et seq.

If in a suit on such bond, the plaintiff obtain judgment on a demurrer to the declaration, the damages must, in the absence of any agreement of the parties, be assessed by a jury. Tannehill v. Thomas, 1 Blackf., 144; Thompson et al. v. Wilson, Id., 358.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Tannehill v. Thomas
1 Blackf. 144 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1821)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
6 Blackf. 168, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mckay-v-craig-ind-1842.