Tanksley v. State
110 S.E. 627, 28 Ga. App. 36, 1921 Ga. App. LEXIS 472
Opinions
The defendant was indicted upon two counts,— one charging forgery, and the other charging the uttering of a forged instrument. The defendant was convicted upon both counts. The evidence did not authorize the conviction under the count which charged the offense of forgery. There having been a conviction under both counts of the indictment, and the evidence not authorizing the conviction under one of the counts, it was error for the court to overrule his motion for a new trial.
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Tanksley v. State, 110 S.E. 627, 28 Ga. App. 36, 1921 Ga. App. LEXIS 472 (Ga. Ct. App. 1921).
110 S.E. 627 (Tanksley v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
McDay v. State
125 S.E.2d 534 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1962)
Leach v. State
128 S.E. 586 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1925)