Leach v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Leach v. State

128 S.E. 438, 34 Ga. App. 137, 1925 Ga. App. LEXIS 74

Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided June 9, 1925·No. 16373·Published

Opinion

Broyles, O. J.

1. It does not appear that the judge abused his discretion in overruling the grounds of the motion for a new trial based upon alleged newly discovered evidence.

2. The remaining grounds of the motion for a new trial are the usual general ones; the verdict was authorized by the evidence, and the refusal to grant the motion was not error.

Judgment affirmed.

Lulce and Bloodworfh, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Broyles, O. J.

1. It does not appear that the judge abused his discretion in overruling the grounds of the motion for a new trial based upon alleged newly discovered evidence.

2. The remaining grounds of the motion for a new trial are the usual general ones; the verdict was authorized by the evidence, and the refusal to grant the motion was not error.

Judgment affirmed.

Lulce and Bloodworfh, JJ., concur.

Leach v. State, 128 S.E. 438, 34 Ga. App. 137, 1925 Ga. App. LEXIS 74 (Ga. Ct. App. 1925).

Pincite

128 S.E. 438 (Leach v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.