TAMURA

10 I. & N. Dec. 717

• Court: Board of Immigration Appeals
• Decided: July 1, 1964
• Docket: 1393
• Status: Published

Opinion

Interim Deeision #1303

MATTER OF TAUTTRA

In SECTION 248 Proceedings

A-13293187 Danidetlby Regional Commissioner July 15,1994

Since a nonimmigrant alien who is employed as a chief cook, supervising 3 to 4 subordinates in the preparation of Japanese fried food specialties and per- forming the duties of the main kitchen chef in the latter's absence, is em- ployed in a "responsible capacity" within, the meaning of 22 OFR 41.41, he is eligible for a change of nonimmigrant status under section 248, Immigration and Nationality Aet, as amended, to that of an employee of a treaty investor under section 101(a) (15) (E) (ii) of the Act.

This matter is before the Regional Commissioner on appeal from the denial of the application for change of nonimmigrant status. The applicant is a married Japanese subject, born August 31, 1930 at Baguio, Philippines. He was admitted to the United States at Honolulu, Hawaii on November 22, 1962 under section 101(a) (15) (H) (1) of the Immigration and Nationality Act on the basis of a peti- tion filed by Saito Restaurant, Inc., a well-known Japanese eating establishment in New York City. He was authorized to remain until November 21, 1963. On October 10, 1963 he applied for change of nonimmigrant status to that of a treaty investor under section 101(a) (15) (E) (ii) of the Act. The Saito Restaurant, which has recently moved to a new location, represents an investment of approximately one million dollars. Its owners, Mrs. Moto Saito and her son, Tokio Saito, are Japanese Na- tionals who are presently maintaining E-2 status. The applicant is in their employ as a chief cook, supervising three to four others in the preparation of Japanese fried food specialties. He earns $103 a week and is provided with meals and living quarters. In denying his application for change of nonimmigrant status, the District Director found that the applicant is ineligible for classification as a treaty in- vestor because he has no financial interest in the restaurant. Section 101 ( a) (10) (E) (ii) of the Immigration and Nationality Act defines a treaty investor as an alien entitled to enter the United States

717 Interim Decision #1393 under and in pursuance of the provisions of a treaty of commerce and navigation between the United States and the foreign state of which he is a national, and the spouse and children of any such alien if ac- companying or following to join him, solely to develop and direct the operations of an enterprise in which he has invested, or of an enter- prise in which he is actively in the process of investing, a substan- tial amount of capital. The applicable regulation (22 OFIt 41.41) further provides as follows: § 41.41 Treaty favestors. (a) An alien shall be classifiable as a nonimmigrant treaty investor if he establishes to the satisfaction of the consular officer that he qualifies under the provisions of section 101(a) (15) (E) (ii) of the Act and that : (1) He intends to depart from the 'United States upon the termination of his status; and (2) He is an alien who has invested or is investing capital in a bum fide enterprise and in not cooking to proceed to the United States in. connection with the investment of a small amount of capital in a marginal enterprise solely for the purpose of earning a living; or that (3) He is employed by a treaty investor in a responsible capacity and the employer is a foreign per- son or organization of the same nationality as the applicant A Treaty of Friendship, Commerce and Navigation exists between the United States and. Japan. Article VIII o(this treaty states, in part, that nationals and companies of either party shall be permitted to engage, within the territories of the other party, accountants and other technical experts, executive personnel, attorneys, agents and other specialists of their choice. Matter of Kobayashi and Doi, In- terim Decision #1313. The applicant herein is engaged as chief cook by Japanese nationals who have invested substantial sums of money in establishing a res- taurant known for its excellent Japanese ouisine. He was brought to the United States by his employers because of his skill in the prepara- tion of Japanese dishes. He is not only charged with the responsi- bility of supervising several subordinate cooks in preparing fried food specialties but also performs the duties of the main kitchen chef in the latter's absence. In contradistinction to the restaurant service personnel discussed in Matter of Kobayashi and Doi, supra, we find that the instant applicant is employed in a "responsible capacity" within the meaning of 22 CFR 41.41 and additionally, may be con- sidered to be a "specialist" within the contemplation of Article V.1.11 of the aforementioned treaty between the United States and -Japan. Accordingly, the appeal Will be sustained. It is ordered that the decision of the District Director be reversed and that the application for change of nonimmigrant status be granted.