Tamman v. Tamman

Hawaii Supreme Court·Decided March 8, 2012·No. SCWC-10-0000032·Published

Opinion

Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-10-0000032 08-MAR-2012 09:29 AM

NO. SCWC-10-0000032

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI'I

JACQUELINE TAMMAN, Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellee,

vs.

SAMI TAMMAN, Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant.

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS

(ICA NO. CAAP-10-0000032; FC-D NO. 07-1-1120)

ORDER ACCEPTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI

(By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, Acoba, and Duffy, JJ., and

Circuit Judge Kim, in place of McKenna, J., recused)

Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant Sami Tamman’s

application for writ of certiorari filed on January 30, 2012, is

hereby accepted.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that no oral argument will be

heard in this case. Any party may, within ten days and pursuant

to Rule 34(c) of the Hawai'i Rules of Appellate Procedure, move

for retention of oral argument.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai'i, March 8, 2012.

Samuel P. King, Jr., /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

on the application and

reply for petitioner/ /s/ Paula A. Nakayama

defendant-appellant.

/s/ Simeon R. Acoba, Jr.

Robert M. Harris and

Jonathan W. Ware, on the

response for respondent/ /s/ James E. Duffy, Jr.

plaintiff-appellee.

/s/ Glenn J. Kim

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Tamman v. Tamman, (haw 2012).

Tamman v. Tamman (Tamman v. Tamman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.