Tamman v. Tamman
This text of Tamman v. Tamman (Tamman v. Tamman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-10-0000032 08-MAR-2012 09:29 AM
NO. SCWC-10-0000032
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI'I
JACQUELINE TAMMAN, Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellee,
vs.
SAMI TAMMAN, Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant.
CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS
(ICA NO. CAAP-10-0000032; FC-D NO. 07-1-1120)
ORDER ACCEPTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI
(By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, Acoba, and Duffy, JJ., and
Circuit Judge Kim, in place of McKenna, J., recused)
Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant Sami Tamman’s
application for writ of certiorari filed on January 30, 2012, is
hereby accepted.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that no oral argument will be
heard in this case. Any party may, within ten days and pursuant
to Rule 34(c) of the Hawai'i Rules of Appellate Procedure, move
for retention of oral argument.
DATED: Honolulu, Hawai'i, March 8, 2012.
Samuel P. King, Jr., /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald
on the application and
reply for petitioner/ /s/ Paula A. Nakayama
defendant-appellant.
/s/ Simeon R. Acoba, Jr.
Robert M. Harris and
Jonathan W. Ware, on the
response for respondent/ /s/ James E. Duffy, Jr.
plaintiff-appellee.
/s/ Glenn J. Kim
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Tamman v. Tamman, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tamman-v-tamman-haw-2012.