Tamman v. Tamman

CourtHawaii Supreme Court
DecidedMarch 8, 2012
DocketSCWC-10-0000032
StatusPublished

This text of Tamman v. Tamman (Tamman v. Tamman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Tamman v. Tamman, (haw 2012).

Opinion

Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-10-0000032 08-MAR-2012 09:29 AM

NO. SCWC-10-0000032

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI'I

JACQUELINE TAMMAN, Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellee,

vs.

SAMI TAMMAN, Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant.

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS

(ICA NO. CAAP-10-0000032; FC-D NO. 07-1-1120)

ORDER ACCEPTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI

(By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, Acoba, and Duffy, JJ., and

Circuit Judge Kim, in place of McKenna, J., recused)

Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant Sami Tamman’s

application for writ of certiorari filed on January 30, 2012, is

hereby accepted.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that no oral argument will be

heard in this case. Any party may, within ten days and pursuant

to Rule 34(c) of the Hawai'i Rules of Appellate Procedure, move

for retention of oral argument.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai'i, March 8, 2012.

Samuel P. King, Jr., /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

on the application and

reply for petitioner/ /s/ Paula A. Nakayama

defendant-appellant.

/s/ Simeon R. Acoba, Jr.

Robert M. Harris and

Jonathan W. Ware, on the

response for respondent/ /s/ James E. Duffy, Jr.

plaintiff-appellee.

/s/ Glenn J. Kim

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Tamman v. Tamman, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tamman-v-tamman-haw-2012.