Tamburro v. International Business Machines Corp.

232 A.D.2d 477, 648 N.Y.S.2d 935, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10206
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedOctober 15, 1996
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 232 A.D.2d 477 (Tamburro v. International Business Machines Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Tamburro v. International Business Machines Corp., 232 A.D.2d 477, 648 N.Y.S.2d 935, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10206 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

Opinion

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiff Richard Honnold appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Held, J.), dated March 14, 1995, as granted the defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint insofar as asserted by Richard Honnold as time-barred.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

Since the appellant discovered his injury in 1986 and did not commence this action until 1994, the Supreme Court properly dismissed the complaint insofar as asserted by him as time-barred (see, CPLR 214-c).

The appellant’s remaining contentions are without merit. O’Brien, J. P., Ritter, Pizzuto and Altman, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Tamburro v. International Business Machines Corp.
234 A.D.2d 535 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
232 A.D.2d 477, 648 N.Y.S.2d 935, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10206, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tamburro-v-international-business-machines-corp-nyappdiv-1996.