Tamares Las Vegas Properties, LLC v. Travelers Indemnity Company

CourtDistrict Court, D. Nevada
DecidedMarch 22, 2023
Docket2:16-cv-02933
StatusUnknown

This text of Tamares Las Vegas Properties, LLC v. Travelers Indemnity Company (Tamares Las Vegas Properties, LLC v. Travelers Indemnity Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Nevada primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Tamares Las Vegas Properties, LLC v. Travelers Indemnity Company, (D. Nev. 2023).

Opinion

1 || FRANK M. FLANSBURG III Nevada Bar No. 6974 2 || PATRICK J. REILLY Nevada Bar No. 6103 3 || MALIQ I. KENDRICKS Nevada Bar No. 15254 4 || BROWNSTEIN HYATT FARBER SCHRECK, LLP 100 North City Parkway, Suite 1600 5 || Las Vegas, NV 89106-4614 Telephone: 702.382.2101 6 || Facsimile: 702.382.8135 fflansburg @ bhfs.com 7 || preilly@bhfs.com mkendricks @bhfs.com 8 Attorneys for Tamares Las Vegas Properties, LLC; 9 || Plaza Hotel & Casino, LLC; and T-UPR, LLC 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 12 TAMARES LAS VEGAS PROPERTIES, Case No. 2:16-cv-02933-JAD-NJK 13 LLC; PLAZA HOTEL & CASINO, LLC; and T-UPR, LLC, Be 14 STIPULATION AND ORDER TO RE- Plaintiffs, SET HEARING DATE [ECF NO. 277] 15 ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR V. ATTORNEYS’ FEES [ECF NO. 265] 16 THE TRAVELERS INDEMNITY (FIRST REQUEST) 17 COMPANY, 18 Defendant. 19 20 STIPULATION 21 Plaintiffs Tamares Las Vegs Properties, LLC, Plaza Hotel & Casino, LLC, and T-UPR, 22 || LLC (collectively “Plaintiffs”’), Dennis T. D’Antonio, Joshua L. Mallin, Weg and Myers, P.C., 23 || Shan | Stibor (“Plaintiffs’ Counsel”) and Defendant The Travelers Indemnity Company 24 || (‘Defendant’), by and through its undersigned counsel, hereby stipulate and agree as follows: 25 1. This stipulation is made pursuant to LR IA 6-1 to reschedule the April 6, 2023, 26 || hearing pursuant to the Notice Setting Hearing (ECF No. 277) for Defendant’s Motion for 27 || Attorney’s Fees (ECF No. 265). 28

1 2. On November 30, 2022, Defendant filed its Motion for Attorneys’ Fees (ECF No. 2 || 265). 3 3. On January 30, 2023, Plaintiffs filed its Opposition to the Motion for Attorneys’ 4 || Fees (ECF No. 271). 5 4. On February 3, 2023, Plaintiffs’ Counsel filed their Opposition to the Motion for 6 || Attorneys’ Fees (ECF No. 274). 7 5. On February 10, 2023, Defendant filed its Reply to Plaintiffs Opposition to the 8 || Motion for Attorneys’ Fees (ECF No. 275). 9 6. On March 3, 2023, Defendant filed its Reply to Plaintiffs’ Counsel’s Opposition to 10 || the Motion for Attorneys’ Fees (ECF No. 276). 11 7. The Court entered a Minute Order Notice of Setting Hearing for the Motion for 12 || Attorneys’ Fees on April 6, 2023 (ECF No. 277). 5 13 8. The Passover holiday begins April 5, 2023, and extends through April 13, 2023. 14 9. Plaintiffs and their Counsel request accommodation of the Passover holiday for ; 15 || parties and counsel, and Defendant consents to same. 16 10. Plaintiffs and Plaintiffs’ Counsel respectfully request that the hearing on the Motion 17 || for Attorneys’ Fees be re-set for April 26, 2023 or to a later date convenient for the Court. 18 || Defendant is eager to have this matter heard and respectfully requests that the hearing be re-set to 19 || the earliest possible date on the Court’s calendar, but consents to the date requested by Plaintiffs 20 || and their Counsel. 21 11. This is the first request by Plaintiffs and their Counsel to reschedule the hearing 22 || date. 23 |... 24]... 25 ||... 26 ||... 27 ||... 28 ||...

1 12. This stipulation is made in good faith and the request is not made in an attempt to 2 || delay proceedings. 3 || DATED this 17" day of March, 2023. DATED this 17" day of March, 2023. 4 /s/ Frank M. Flansburg III /s/ Gregory P. Varga Frank M. Flansburg III Amy M. Samberg 5 Patrick J. Reilly Lee H. Gorlin Maliq I. Kendricks CLYDE & CO US LLP 6 BROWNSTEIN HYATT FARBER 7251 West Lake Mead Boulevard, Suite 430 SCHRECK, LLP Las Vegas, NV 89128 7 100 North City Parkway, Suite 1600 Las Vegas, NV 89106-4614 Gregory P. Varga 8 Attorneys for Tamares Las Vegas Properties, J. Tyler Butts LLC; Plaza Hotel & Casino, LLC; and T- ROBINSON & COLE LLP 9 UPR, LLC 280 Trumbull Street Hartford, CT 06103 10 Attorneys for Defendant The Travelers Indemnity Company 11 || DATED this 17th day of March, 2023. § 12 || /s/James J. Pisanelli James J. Pisanelli 13 || DebraL. Spinelli Tyler W. Stevens 14 || Pisanelli Bice PLLC 400 South 7" Street, Suite 300 15 || Las Vegas, NV 89101 Attorneys for Dennis D’ Antonio, Joshua L. 16 || Mallin, Weg and Myers P.C., Shan Davis, and Davis | Stibor. 17 18 ORDER 19 Based upon the parties’ stipulation and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED 20 || AS FOLLOWS: 21 1. The hearing for Defendant’s Motion for Attorney Fees scheduled for April 6, 2023, 22 || is vacated. 23 2. The Defendant’s Motion for Attorney Fees is rescheduled to be heard on 24 || May 4, 2023 at 3:00 p.m. 25 IT IS SO ORDERED. 26 DATED this 22nd day of March, 2023. □□□ 28 UNITED STATES-BISTRICTJUDGE

yy

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Tamares Las Vegas Properties, LLC v. Travelers Indemnity Company, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tamares-las-vegas-properties-llc-v-travelers-indemnity-company-nvd-2023.