Tamara Henderson-Prouty v. Louis DeJoy
This text of Tamara Henderson-Prouty v. Louis DeJoy (Tamara Henderson-Prouty v. Louis DeJoy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________
No. 22-1500 ___________________________
Tamara Jean Henderson-Prouty, also known as Tamara Jean Henderson-Hoving
lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant
v.
Louis DeJoy, Postmaster General
lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellee ____________
Appeal from United States District Court for the District of Minnesota ____________
Submitted: October 7, 2022 Filed: November 28, 2022 [Unpublished] ____________
Before COLLOTON, KELLY, and KOBES, Circuit Judges. ____________
PER CURIAM.
Tamara Henderson-Prouty, currently known as Tamara Henderson-Hoving, appeals the district court’s1 adverse grant of summary judgment in her employment
1 The Honorable Patrick J. Schiltz, now Chief Judge, United States District Court for the District of Minnesota. discrimination action. After careful review of the record and the parties’ arguments on appeal, we conclude that the grant of summary judgment was proper. See Banks v. John Deere & Co., 829 F.3d 661, 665 (8th Cir. 2016) (grant of summary judgment is reviewed de novo). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. ______________________________
-2-
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Tamara Henderson-Prouty v. Louis DeJoy, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tamara-henderson-prouty-v-louis-dejoy-ca8-2022.