Home/Supreme Court of Georgia/Talmadge v. McDonald

Talmadge v. McDonald

152 S.E. 96, 170 Ga. 22, 1930 Ga. LEXIS 387
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Talmadge v. McDonald. Read the opinion of the Court — 171 Ga. 592 →
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided February 12, 1930·No. Nos. 7097, 7098, 7099·Published

Opinion

Russell, C. J.

Tlie decision of eacli of these eases is controlled by the rulings in Talmadge v. Cordell, ante, 13; and the judgment in each case is affirmed with the same direction as contained in the opinion in Talmadge v. Cordell.

Judgments affirmed, with direction.

All the Justices concur, except Russell, C. J., and Athinson, J., who dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Talmadge v. McDonald, 152 S.E. 96, 170 Ga. 22, 1930 Ga. LEXIS 387 (Ga. 1930).

152 S.E. 96 (Talmadge v. McDonald) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.