Home/Supreme Court of Georgia/Talmadge v. McDonald

Talmadge v. McDonald

152 S.E. 96, 170 Ga. 22, 1930 Ga. LEXIS 387
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedFebruary 12, 1930
DocketNos. 7097, 7098, 7099
StatusPublished

This text of 152 S.E. 96 (Talmadge v. McDonald) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Talmadge v. McDonald, 152 S.E. 96, 170 Ga. 22, 1930 Ga. LEXIS 387 (Ga. 1930).

Opinion

Russell, C. J.

Tlie decision of eacli of these eases is controlled by the rulings in Talmadge v. Cordell, ante, 13; and the judgment in each case is affirmed with the same direction as contained in the opinion in Talmadge v. Cordell.

Judgments affirmed, with direction.

All the Justices concur, except Russell, C. J., and Athinson, J., who dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
152 S.E. 96, 170 Ga. 22, 1930 Ga. LEXIS 387, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/talmadge-v-mcdonald-ga-1930.