Tallarico v. Autenreith

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Tallarico v. Autenreith

22 A.2d 700, 343 Pa. 325, 1941 Pa. LEXIS 619

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedSeptember 29, 1941

DocketAppeal, 124

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 22 A.2d 700 (Tallarico v. Autenreith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Tallarico v. Autenreith, 22 A.2d 700, 343 Pa. 325, 1941 Pa. LEXIS 619 (Pa. 1941).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam,

The court below refused to quash a writ of scire facias issued by the living defendants to bring upon the record as a party defendant Edna B. Kerr, executrix of the Estate of C. H. Kerr, deceased, who was an original defendant. From this action the executrix appeals. The appeal is interlocutory and, therefore, must be quashed: Steach v. Hippensteele, 315 Pa. 420, 172 A. 715; Magaro v. Metropolitan Edison Co., 315 Pa. 369, 172 A. 865.

Appeal quashed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam,

The court below refused to quash a writ of scire facias issued by the living defendants to bring upon the record as a party defendant Edna B. Kerr, executrix of the Estate of C. H. Kerr, deceased, who was an original defendant. From this action the executrix appeals. The appeal is interlocutory and, therefore, must be quashed: Steach v. Hippensteele, 315 Pa. 420, 172 A. 715; Magaro v. Metropolitan Edison Co., 315 Pa. 369, 172 A. 865.

Appeal quashed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

22 A.2d 700, 343 Pa. 325, 1941 Pa. LEXIS 619, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tallarico-v-autenreith-pa-1941.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack