Magaro v. Metropolitan Edison Co.
This text of 172 A. 865 (Magaro v. Metropolitan Edison Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This appeal is from an order making absolute a rule upon petition of defendant to bring upon the record, under the provisions of the Act of April 10, 1929, P. L. 478, *370 as amended by thé Act of June 22, 1931, P. L. 663, and the Act of May 18, 1933, P. L. 807, the Township of Lower Swatara, The Pennsylvania Railroad Company and The First Catholic Slovak Union of America, as additional defendants. The motion to quash must be sustained as the order of the lower court appealed from is merely interlocutory and not a final judgment of the matter in controversy: Steach v. Hippensteele, 315 Pa. 420, and cases there cited.
Appeal quashed at appellant’s costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
172 A. 865, 315 Pa. 369, 1934 Pa. LEXIS 624, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/magaro-v-metropolitan-edison-co-pa-1934.