Magaro v. Metropolitan Edison Co.

172 A. 865, 315 Pa. 369, 1934 Pa. LEXIS 624
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided May 22, 1934·No. Appeal, 27·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam,

This appeal is from an order making absolute a rule upon petition of defendant to bring upon the record, under the provisions of the Act of April 10, 1929, P. L. 478, *370 as amended by thé Act of June 22, 1931, P. L. 663, and the Act of May 18, 1933, P. L. 807, the Township of Lower Swatara, The Pennsylvania Railroad Company and The First Catholic Slovak Union of America, as additional defendants. The motion to quash must be sustained as the order of the lower court appealed from is merely interlocutory and not a final judgment of the matter in controversy: Steach v. Hippensteele, 315 Pa. 420, and cases there cited.

Appeal quashed at appellant’s costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Magaro v. Metropolitan Edison Co., 172 A. 865, 315 Pa. 369, 1934 Pa. LEXIS 624 (Pa. 1934).

172 A. 865 (Magaro v. Metropolitan Edison Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lewandowski v. General Telephone Co.
302 A.2d 478 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1973)
Morgan v. Dean Phipps Stores
239 A.2d 312 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1968)
Scott Estate
211 A.2d 429 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1965)
University Square No. 1, Inc. v. Marhoefer
180 A.2d 427 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1962)
Zeigenfuse v. Boltz
164 A.2d 663 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1960)
Tallarico v. Autenreith
22 A.2d 700 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1941)
Cummings v. A. F. Rees, Inc.
190 A. 416 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1936)