Tallal v. Bank One, N.A.

2002 Ohio 1489, 94 Ohio St. 3d 1251
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedApril 3, 2002
Docket2001-0512
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 2002 Ohio 1489 (Tallal v. Bank One, N.A.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Tallal v. Bank One, N.A., 2002 Ohio 1489, 94 Ohio St. 3d 1251 (Ohio 2002).

Opinion

[This decision has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 94 Ohio St.3d 1251.]

TALLAL, A.K.A. TURNER, APPELLANT, v. BANK ONE, N.A., APPELLEE. [Cite as Tallal v. Bank One, N.A., 2002-Ohio-1489.] Appeal dismissed as improvidently allowed. (No. 01-512—Submitted February 27, 2002—Decided April 3, 2002.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Summit County, No. 19592. __________________ {¶ 1} The cause is dismissed, sua sponte, as having been improvidently allowed. MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, HANDWORK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur. PETER M. HANDWORK, J., of the Sixth Appellate District, sitting for COOK, J. __________________ Blakemore, Meeker & Bowler Co., L.P.A., Robert C. Meeker and Darren W. DeHaven, for appellant. Zeiger & Carpenter, Marion H. Little, Jr., John W. Zeiger and Eva C. Gildee, for appellee. __________________

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Tallal v. Bank One, N.A.
767 N.E.2d 1178 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2002)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2002 Ohio 1489, 94 Ohio St. 3d 1251, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tallal-v-bank-one-na-ohio-2002.