Tallal v. Bank One, N.A.
This text of 2002 Ohio 1489 (Tallal v. Bank One, N.A.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[This decision has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 94 Ohio St.3d 1251.]
TALLAL, A.K.A. TURNER, APPELLANT, v. BANK ONE, N.A., APPELLEE. [Cite as Tallal v. Bank One, N.A., 2002-Ohio-1489.] Appeal dismissed as improvidently allowed. (No. 01-512—Submitted February 27, 2002—Decided April 3, 2002.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Summit County, No. 19592. __________________ {¶ 1} The cause is dismissed, sua sponte, as having been improvidently allowed. MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, HANDWORK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur. PETER M. HANDWORK, J., of the Sixth Appellate District, sitting for COOK, J. __________________ Blakemore, Meeker & Bowler Co., L.P.A., Robert C. Meeker and Darren W. DeHaven, for appellant. Zeiger & Carpenter, Marion H. Little, Jr., John W. Zeiger and Eva C. Gildee, for appellee. __________________
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2002 Ohio 1489, 94 Ohio St. 3d 1251, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tallal-v-bank-one-na-ohio-2002.