Home/California Court of Appeal/Taliaferro v. Wampler

Taliaferro v. Wampler

257 P.2d 674, 118 Cal. App. 2d 391, 1953 Cal. App. LEXIS 1565
CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal
DecidedJune 9, 1953
DocketCiv. No. 15486
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 257 P.2d 674 (Taliaferro v. Wampler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Taliaferro v. Wampler, 257 P.2d 674, 118 Cal. App. 2d 391, 1953 Cal. App. LEXIS 1565 (Cal. Ct. App. 1953).

Opinion

DOOLING, J.

Plaintiff has attempted to appeal from a minute order and a written order subsequently signed by the trial judge sustaining a demurrer to his second amended complaint without leave to amend. No judgment appears in the record and since no appeal lies from an order sustaining demurrer the appeal must be dismissed. (Cole v. Rush, 40 Cal.2d 178 [252 P.2d 1].)

Appeal dismissed.

Nourse, P. J., and McComb, J. assigned, concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

A. L. Castle, Inc. v. County of San Benito
227 Cal. App. 2d 602 (California Court of Appeal, 1964)
Smith v. Smith
272 P.2d 118 (California Court of Appeal, 1954)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
257 P.2d 674, 118 Cal. App. 2d 391, 1953 Cal. App. LEXIS 1565, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/taliaferro-v-wampler-calctapp-1953.