Talcott v. Central Bank & Trust Co.

262 So. 2d 658, 1972 Fla. LEXIS 3755
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided May 3, 1972·No. No. 41223·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The District Court of Appeal, Third District, has certified that its decision in this [659]*659cause is one passing upon a question of great public interest. Article V, Section 4(2), Florida Constitution, F.S.A.

The factual circumstances, background, and questions involved are set forth in the decision of the District Court reported at 247 So.2d 727 (Fla.App.3rd, 1971).

We have reviewed the decision below, the record in the cause, the briefs of counsel for both sides, and have heard oral argument. It is our judgment that the decision of the District Court appropriately disposes of the issues presented. Accordingly, the opinion certified is approved as the response of this Court.

The writ of certiorari is therefore discharged.

ROBERTS, C. J., and ERVIN, ADKINS, BOYD and McCAIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Talcott v. Central Bank & Trust Co., 262 So. 2d 658, 1972 Fla. LEXIS 3755 (Fla. 1972).

262 So. 2d 658 (Talcott v. Central Bank & Trust Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Dunmore v. Eagle Motor Lines
560 So. 2d 1261 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)
Volkswagen of America, Inc. v. Emerson
466 So. 2d 346 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1985)
Sun First National Bank of Melbourne v. Batchelor
321 So. 2d 73 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1975)
Walker v. U-Haul Company, Inc.
300 So. 2d 289 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1974)
Florida Tomato Packers v. Wilson
296 So. 2d 536 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1974)
Randle-Eastern Ambulance Service, Inc. v. Millens
294 So. 2d 38 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1974)