Talbot v. Talbot

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Talbot v. Talbot

204 A.D.2d 1029, 614 N.Y.S.2d 959, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6856

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 27, 1994

StatusPublished

This text of 204 A.D.2d 1029 (Talbot v. Talbot) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Talbot v. Talbot, 204 A.D.2d 1029, 614 N.Y.S.2d 959, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6856 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

—Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Family Court properly considered the circumstances of the parties in determining the best interests of the child (see, Domestic Relations Law § 240; Eschbach v Eschbach, 56 NY2d 167; Friederwitzer v Friederwitzer, 55 NY2d 89). When the decision of a trial court is justified by the evidence, an appellate court should be reluctant to substitute its own decision (see, Eschbach v Eschbach, supra, at 173; Burke v White, 126 AD2d 838, 841; Robinson v Robinson, 111 AD2d 316, 318, appeal dismissed 66 NY2d 613). (Appeal from Order of Steuben County Family Court, Purple, Jr., J.—Custody.) Present—Denman, P. J., Green, Lawton, Wesley and Callahan, JJ. •

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Family Court properly considered the circumstances of the parties in determining the best interests of the child (see, Domestic Relations Law § 240; Eschbach v Eschbach, 56 NY2d 167; Friederwitzer v Friederwitzer, 55 NY2d 89). When the decision of a trial court is justified by the evidence, an appellate court should be reluctant to substitute its own decision (see, Eschbach v Eschbach, supra, at 173; Burke v White, 126 AD2d 838, 841; Robinson v Robinson, 111 AD2d 316, 318, appeal dismissed 66 NY2d 613). (Appeal from Order of Steuben County Family Court, Purple, Jr., J.—Custody.) Present—Denman, P. J., Green, Lawton, Wesley and Callahan, JJ. •

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

204 A.D.2d 1029, 614 N.Y.S.2d 959, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6856, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/talbot-v-talbot-nyappdiv-1994.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack