Takenaka v. Bankers Trust Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Takenaka v. Bankers Trust Co.

225 A.D. 860

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 15, 1929

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 225 A.D. 860 (Takenaka v. Bankers Trust Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Takenaka v. Bankers Trust Co., 225 A.D. 860 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1929).

Pincite

Opinion

Determination affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — Dowling, P. J., Merrell, Finch, O’Malley and Proskauer, JJ.; Dowling, P. J., and Finch, J., dissent upon the ground that it affirmatively appears by the testimony of the plaintiff’s own witness, the accountant, that the plaintiff’s duty in respect to the returned checks, as laid down in Stumpp v. Bank of New York (212 App. Div. 608), had not been discharged. [132 Misc. 322.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Determination affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — Dowling, P. J., Merrell, Finch, O’Malley and Proskauer, JJ.; Dowling, P. J., and Finch, J., dissent upon the ground that it affirmatively appears by the testimony of the plaintiff’s own witness, the accountant, that the plaintiff’s duty in respect to the returned checks, as laid down in Stumpp v. Bank of New York (212 App. Div. 608), had not been discharged. [132 Misc. 322.]

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

225 A.D. 860, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/takenaka-v-bankers-trust-co-nyappdiv-1929.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack