Tague v. Delaware, L. & W. R.
This text of 5 F.R.D. 337 (Tague v. Delaware, L. & W. R.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The motion is granted—such requests are largely in the discretion of the court exercised in accordance with the new Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. following § 723c. I see nothing “privileged” as to these reports and written statements. I do not mean by this to decide where oral statements by a client to his attorney is concerned. Nothing of that nature is here presented. These reports and statements may be useful to plaintiff. Connecticut Imp. Co. v. Continental Distilling Corp., D.C., 1 F.R.D. 190.
Settle order.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
5 F.R.D. 337, 1946 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1563, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tague-v-delaware-l-w-r-nyed-1946.