Tacoma Lumber & Manufacturing Co. v. Wolff
29 P. 936, 4 Wash. 260, 1892 Wash. LEXIS 209
Opinion
The opinion of the court was delivered by
The appellants, after the transcript and the briefs of both sides are on file, move to dismiss the appeal. The respondent having moved to dismiss in its brief, under rule 22, objects that the motion now made should not be heard. “We do not think the rule should be interpreted to take from the appellants the right to control their case, and the motion is therefore granted.
Anders, C. J., and Dunbar, Scott and Hoyt, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Tacoma Lumber & Manufacturing Co. v. Wolff, 29 P. 936, 4 Wash. 260, 1892 Wash. LEXIS 209 (Wash. 1892).
29 P. 936 (Tacoma Lumber & Manufacturing Co. v. Wolff) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
West Pub. Co. v. Lawyers' Co-Operative Pub. Co.
79 F. 756 (Second Circuit, 1897)