Tacoma Lumber & Manufacturing Co. v. Wolff

Washington Supreme Court

Tacoma Lumber & Manufacturing Co. v. Wolff

29 P. 936, 4 Wash. 260, 1892 Wash. LEXIS 209

CourtWashington Supreme Court

DecidedMarch 29, 1892

DocketNo. 461

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 29 P. 936 (Tacoma Lumber & Manufacturing Co. v. Wolff) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Washington Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Tacoma Lumber & Manufacturing Co. v. Wolff, 29 P. 936, 4 Wash. 260, 1892 Wash. LEXIS 209 (Wash. 1892).

Pincite

Opinion

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Stiles, J. —

The appellants, after the transcript and the briefs of both sides are on file, move to dismiss the appeal. The respondent having moved to dismiss in its brief, under rule 22, objects that the motion now made should not be heard. “We do not think the rule should be interpreted to take from the appellants the right to control their case, and the motion is therefore granted.

Anders, C. J., and Dunbar, Scott and Hoyt, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Stiles, J. —

The appellants, after the transcript and the briefs of both sides are on file, move to dismiss the appeal. The respondent having moved to dismiss in its brief, under rule 22, objects that the motion now made should not be heard. “We do not think the rule should be interpreted to take from the appellants the right to control their case, and the motion is therefore granted.

Anders, C. J., and Dunbar, Scott and Hoyt, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

29 P. 936, 4 Wash. 260, 1892 Wash. LEXIS 209, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tacoma-lumber-manufacturing-co-v-wolff-wash-1892.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack