TACCO FALCON POINT, INC. v. Clapper
758 N.W.2d 530, 482 Mich. 1156
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in TACCO FALCON POINT, INC. v. Clapper. Read the opinion of the Court — 481 Mich. 886 →
Opinion
TACCO FALCON POINT, INC., Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant-Appellee,
v.
David M. CLAPPER, Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff/Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellant/Cross-Appellee,
v.
Art Midwest, Inc., Intervening Third-Party Defendant-Appellee, and
American Realty Investors, Inc., and American Realty Trust, Inc., Third-Party Defendants-Appellees/Cross-Appellants, and
Art Midwest, L.P., Third-Party Defendant.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
Order
On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court's June 4, 2008 order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order was entered erroneously.
*531 MICHAEL F. CAVANAGH and MARKMAN, JJ., would grant reconsideration and, on reconsideration, would remand this case to the trial court for the reasons stated in the Court of Appeals dissenting opinion.
MARILYN J. KELLY, J., would grant reconsideration.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
TACCO FALCON POINT, INC. v. Clapper, 758 N.W.2d 530, 482 Mich. 1156 (Mich. 2008).
758 N.W.2d 530 (TACCO FALCON POINT, INC. v. Clapper) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.