TACCO FALCON POINT, INC. v. Clapper

Michigan Supreme Court

TACCO FALCON POINT, INC. v. Clapper

749 N.W.2d 254, 481 Mich. 886

CourtMichigan Supreme Court

DecidedJune 4, 2008

Docket133430

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 749 N.W.2d 254 (TACCO FALCON POINT, INC. v. Clapper) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

TACCO FALCON POINT, INC. v. Clapper, 749 N.W.2d 254, 481 Mich. 886 (Mich. 2008).

Pincite

Opinion

749 N.W.2d 254 (2008)

TACCO FALCON POINT, INC., Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant-Appellee,
v.
David M. CLAPPER, Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff/Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellant/Cross-Appellee,
v.
Art Midwest, Inc., Intervening Third-Party Defendant-Appellee, and
American Realty Investors, Inc., and American Realty Trust, Inc., Third-Party Defendants-Appellees/Cross-Appellants, and
Art Midwest, L.P., Third-Party Defendant.

Docket No. 133430. COA No. 271525.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

June 4, 2008.

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the February 1, 2007 judgment of the Court of Appeals and the application for leave to appeal as cross-appellant are considered, and they are DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

MICHAEL F. CAVANAGH, J., would remand this case to the trial court for the reasons stated in the Court of Appeals dissenting opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI