TACCO FALCON POINT, INC. v. Clapper
749 N.W.2d 254, 481 Mich. 886
Opinion
TACCO FALCON POINT, INC., Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant-Appellee,
v.
David M. CLAPPER, Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff/Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellant/Cross-Appellee,
v.
Art Midwest, Inc., Intervening Third-Party Defendant-Appellee, and
American Realty Investors, Inc., and American Realty Trust, Inc., Third-Party Defendants-Appellees/Cross-Appellants, and
Art Midwest, L.P., Third-Party Defendant.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the February 1, 2007 judgment of the Court of Appeals and the application for leave to appeal as cross-appellant are considered, and they are DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
MICHAEL F. CAVANAGH, J., would remand this case to the trial court for the reasons stated in the Court of Appeals dissenting opinion.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
TACCO FALCON POINT, INC. v. Clapper, 749 N.W.2d 254, 481 Mich. 886 (Mich. 2008).
749 N.W.2d 254 (TACCO FALCON POINT, INC. v. Clapper) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Tacco Falcon Point, Inc. v. Atlantic Ltd. Partnership XII
937 N.E.2d 1212 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 2010)