Taccino v. Homeq Servicing
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-1260
WILLIAM A. TACCINO; MARLENE M. TACCINO,
Plaintiffs - Appellants,
v.
HOMEQ SERVICING; MANCINI & ASSOCIATES; U.S. BANK N/A; MORRIS SCHNEIDER PRYOR JOHNSON & FREEDMAN, LLC; G. DOUGLAS REINHARD; RICK CONNER; EXPRESS MORTGAGE FINANCIAL SERVICES, P.C.,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Martinsburg. John Preston Bailey, Chief District Judge. (3:08-cv-00185-JPB)
Submitted: September 16, 2010 Decided: October 26, 2010
Before NIEMEYER, DAVIS, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
William A. Taccino, Marlene M. Taccino, Appellants Pro Se. Wendy Anne Owens, LAW OFFICE OF WENDY A. OWENS, PC, Savannah, Georgia; Marshall Howard Ross, WHARTON, ALDHIZER & WEAVER, PLC, Harrisonburg, Virginia; Jason Patrick Foster, STEPTOE & JOHNSON, LLP, Martinsburg, West Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
William A. Taccino and Marlene M. Taccino appeal the
district court’s order granting summary judgment to Defendants
in this civil action. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. Taccino v. Homeq Serv., No.
3:08-cv-00185-JPB (N.D. W. Va. Feb. 18, 2010). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Taccino v. Homeq Servicing (Taccino v. Homeq Servicing) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.