Taccino v. Homeq Servicing

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 26, 2010·No. 10-1260·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-1260

WILLIAM A. TACCINO; MARLENE M. TACCINO,

Plaintiffs - Appellants,

v.

HOMEQ SERVICING; MANCINI & ASSOCIATES; U.S. BANK N/A; MORRIS SCHNEIDER PRYOR JOHNSON & FREEDMAN, LLC; G. DOUGLAS REINHARD; RICK CONNER; EXPRESS MORTGAGE FINANCIAL SERVICES, P.C.,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Martinsburg. John Preston Bailey, Chief District Judge. (3:08-cv-00185-JPB)

Submitted: September 16, 2010 Decided: October 26, 2010

Before NIEMEYER, DAVIS, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

William A. Taccino, Marlene M. Taccino, Appellants Pro Se. Wendy Anne Owens, LAW OFFICE OF WENDY A. OWENS, PC, Savannah, Georgia; Marshall Howard Ross, WHARTON, ALDHIZER & WEAVER, PLC, Harrisonburg, Virginia; Jason Patrick Foster, STEPTOE & JOHNSON, LLP, Martinsburg, West Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

William A. Taccino and Marlene M. Taccino appeal the

district court’s order granting summary judgment to Defendants

in this civil action. We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

by the district court. Taccino v. Homeq Serv., No.

3:08-cv-00185-JPB (N.D. W. Va. Feb. 18, 2010). We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Taccino v. Homeq Servicing, (4th Cir. 2010).

Taccino v. Homeq Servicing (Taccino v. Homeq Servicing) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.