Taccino v. Homeq Servicing

Fourth Circuit

Taccino v. Homeq Servicing

399 F. App'x 799

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 26, 2010·No. No. 10-1260·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

William A. Taccino and Marlene M. Tac-cino appeal the district court’s order granting summary judgment to Defendants in this civil action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Taccino v. Homeq Serv., No. 3:08-cv-00185-JPB (N.D.W.Va. Feb. 18, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

William A. Taccino and Marlene M. Tac-cino appeal the district court’s order granting summary judgment to Defendants in this civil action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Taccino v. Homeq Serv., No. 3:08-cv-00185-JPB (N.D.W.Va. Feb. 18, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Taccino v. Homeq Servicing, 399 F. App'x 799 (4th Cir. 2010).

Pincite

399 F. App'x 799 (Taccino v. Homeq Servicing) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.