Taccino v. Bank of America

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-2098

JAMES R. TACCINO; JANE E. TACCINO,

Plaintiffs - Appellants,

v.

BANK OF AMERICA, Countrywide Home Loans Assignee; UNION FIRST MORTGAGE, a/k/a DAV Law Enterprises, broker for Countrywide,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, Senior District Judge. (1:10-cv-00316-JFM)

Submitted: February 24, 2011 Decided: February 28, 2011

Before GREGORY, SHEDD, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James R. Taccino, Jane E. Taccino, Appellants Pro Se. Glenn Cline, Charles Scott Hirsch, BALLARD SPAHR, LLP, Baltimore, Maryland; Marc Ominsky, CHAIFETZ & COYLE, PC, Columbia, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

James R. Taccino and Jane E. Taccino appeal the

district court’s order dismissing their civil complaint. We

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. Taccino v. Bank of America, No. 1:10-cv-00316-JFM (D.

Md. Sept. 2, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED