Taccino v. Bank of America

Fourth Circuit

Taccino v. Bank of America

413 F. App'x 627

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided February 28, 2011·No. No. 10-2098·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

James R. Taccino and Jane É. Taccino appeal the district court’s order dismissing their civil complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Taccino v. Bank of America, No. 1:10-cv-00316-JFM (D.Md. Sept. 2, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

James R. Taccino and Jane É. Taccino appeal the district court’s order dismissing their civil complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Taccino v. Bank of America, No. 1:10-cv-00316-JFM (D.Md. Sept. 2, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Taccino v. Bank of America, 413 F. App'x 627 (4th Cir. 2011).

Pincite

413 F. App'x 627 (Taccino v. Bank of America) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.