Taccino v. Bank of America
This text of Taccino v. Bank of America (Taccino v. Bank of America) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-2098
JAMES R. TACCINO; JANE E. TACCINO,
Plaintiffs - Appellants,
v.
BANK OF AMERICA, Countrywide Home Loans Assignee; UNION FIRST MORTGAGE, a/k/a DAV Law Enterprises, broker for Countrywide,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, Senior District Judge. (1:10-cv-00316-JFM)
Submitted: February 24, 2011 Decided: February 28, 2011
Before GREGORY, SHEDD, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
James R. Taccino, Jane E. Taccino, Appellants Pro Se. Glenn Cline, Charles Scott Hirsch, BALLARD SPAHR, LLP, Baltimore, Maryland; Marc Ominsky, CHAIFETZ & COYLE, PC, Columbia, Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
James R. Taccino and Jane E. Taccino appeal the
district court’s order dismissing their civil complaint. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Taccino v. Bank of America, No. 1:10-cv-00316-JFM (D.
Md. Sept. 2, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Taccino v. Bank of America, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/taccino-v-bank-of-america-ca4-2011.