T. v. H.
This text of 264 A.2d 244 (T. v. H.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
T., PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
H., DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Before Judges KILKENNY, LABRECQUE and LEONARD.
Mr. Burrell Ives Humphreys argued the cause for appellant (Messrs. Hoffmann & Humphreys, attorneys).
Mr. William F. Tompkins argued the cause for respondent (Messrs. Lum, Biunno & Tompkins, attorneys; Mr. Theodore L. Abeles, on the brief).
PER CURIAM.
The order is affirmed on other factual grounds.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
264 A.2d 244, 110 N.J. Super. 8, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/t-v-h-njsuperctappdiv-1970.