T. & P. R. R. v. Williams

1 White & W. 98
CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedMay 3, 1882
DocketNo. 2214, R. Book No. 4, p. 209
StatusPublished

This text of 1 White & W. 98 (T. & P. R. R. v. Williams) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
T. & P. R. R. v. Williams, 1 White & W. 98 (Tex. Ct. App. 1882).

Opinion

Opinion by

Winkler, J.

§ 249. Joint owner; suit by. One of several joint owners cannot maintain a suit to recover his undivided .or individual interest in property destroyed. [Stachely v. Pierce, 28 Tex. 328.]

.§ 250. Damages; measure of for property destroyed. The measure of damages for property destroyed is the market value of the property at the time and place where destroyed. [Masterson v. Goodlett, 46 Tex. 406.] Anri in such cases it is the duy of the court to instruct the jury as to what is the legal meaning of market value. [R. R. Co. v. LeGierse, 51 Tex. 203.]

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Stachely v. Peirce
28 Tex. 328 (Texas Supreme Court, 1866)
Masterson v. Goodlett
46 Tex. 402 (Texas Supreme Court, 1877)
Galveston, Harrisburg & San Antonio Railroad v. Le Gierse
51 Tex. 189 (Texas Supreme Court, 1879)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 White & W. 98, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/t-p-r-r-v-williams-texapp-1882.