T. L. Edge v. North State Feldspar Corp.

193 S.E. 2, 212 N.C. 246, 1937 N.C. LEXIS 285
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedOctober 13, 1937
StatusPublished
Cited by10 cases

This text of 193 S.E. 2 (T. L. Edge v. North State Feldspar Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
T. L. Edge v. North State Feldspar Corp., 193 S.E. 2, 212 N.C. 246, 1937 N.C. LEXIS 285 (N.C. 1937).

Opinion

Stacy, C. J.

The verdict is uncertain or ambiguous. Wood v. Jones, 198 N. C., 356, 151 S. E., 732. It is in the alternative. Pearce v. Fisher, 133 N. C., 333, 45 S. E., 638. Its inconclusiveness necessitates another hearing. Plotkin v. Bond Co., 200 N. C., 590, 157 S. E., 870; Bank v. Broom Co., 188 N. C., 508, 125 S. E., 12; Holler v. Tel. Co., 149 N. C., 336, 63 S. E., 92. “A verdict finding matter uncertainly or ambiguously, is insufficient, and no judgment shall be given thereon.” Coke on Littleton, 227, quoted with approval in Crews v. Crews, 64 N. C., 536. “It is misleading to embody in one issue two propositions as to which the jury might give different responses.” Emery v. R. R., 102 N. C., 209, 9 S. E., 139; Carey v. Carey, 108 N. C., 267, 12 S. E., 1038; Mfg. Co. v. Assur. Co., 106 N. C., 28, 10 S. E., 1057; DeHart v. Jenkins, 211 N. C., 314, 190 S. E., 218.

A verdict, whether upon one or many issues, should be certain and determinative of the controversy. Plotkin v. Bond Co., supra; Chapman-Hunt Co. v. Board of Education, 198 N. C., 111, 150 S. E., 713; Bank v. Broom Co., supra; McAdoo v. R. R., 105 N. C., 140, 11 S. E., 316; Emery v. R. R., supra.

Here, the alternative verdict éstablishes neither proposition with certainty or definiteness, as the evidence of mutual mistake, if any, is very slight, and the sufficiency of the allegation of fraud is quite doubtful, if not deficient. Pearce v. Fisher, supra.

*248 Nor is the verdict capable of interpretation so as to support the judgment quod recuperet, by proper reference to the pleadings, the evidence, the admissions of the parties, and the charge of the court. Newbern v. Gordon, 201 N.C., 817, 160 S. E., 182; Short v. Kaltman, 192 N. C., 154, 134 S. E., 425; Kannan v. Assad, 182 N. C., 77, 108 S. E., 383. The rights of the parties have not been sufficiently determined.

New trial.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Stacy v. Jedco Construction, Inc.
457 S.E.2d 875 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1995)
Edwards v. Hardin
439 S.E.2d 808 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1994)
Smith v. Childs
437 S.E.2d 500 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1993)
Foy v. Spinks
414 S.E.2d 87 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1992)
Connor v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance
143 S.E.2d 98 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1965)
Coulbourn v. Armstrong
91 S.E.2d 912 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1956)
Seaboard Air Line Railroad v. Gill
227 F.2d 64 (Fourth Circuit, 1955)
Seaboard Air Line Railroad Company v. Tom Gill
227 F.2d 64 (Fourth Circuit, 1955)
Gibson v. Central Manufacturers' Mutual Insurance
62 S.E.2d 320 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1950)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
193 S.E. 2, 212 N.C. 246, 1937 N.C. LEXIS 285, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/t-l-edge-v-north-state-feldspar-corp-nc-1937.