Szymula v. Pine Cedars, Inc.

266 S.W.3d 887, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1574, 2008 WL 4707205
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided October 28, 2008·No. ED 90567·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

This appeal arises from an action for personal injuries filed by Gail Szymula (Plaintiff) and her husband Donald Szymu-la against Pine Cedars, Inc. and BP Products North America, Inc. (BP). We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the trial court did not err in (1) directing a verdict in favor of BP, (2) instructing the jury on comparative fault, and (8) refusing to amend the judgment amount to include Plaintiffs costs. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Szymula v. Pine Cedars, Inc., 266 S.W.3d 887, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1574, 2008 WL 4707205 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).

266 S.W.3d 887 (Szymula v. Pine Cedars, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

OMR CORPORATION v. Bauer
266 S.W.3d 887 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2008)