Szymula v. Pine Cedars, Inc.
Opinion
ORDER
This appeal arises from an action for personal injuries filed by Gail Szymula (Plaintiff) and her husband Donald Szymu-la against Pine Cedars, Inc. and BP Products North America, Inc. (BP). We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the trial court did not err in (1) directing a verdict in favor of BP, (2) instructing the jury on comparative fault, and (8) refusing to amend the judgment amount to include Plaintiffs costs. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
266 S.W.3d 887 (Szymula v. Pine Cedars, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.