OMR CORPORATION v. Bauer

Missouri Court of Appeals

OMR CORPORATION v. Bauer

266 S.W.3d 887, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1575, 2008 WL 4707360

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedOctober 28, 2008

DocketED 90541

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 266 S.W.3d 887 (OMR CORPORATION v. Bauer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

OMR CORPORATION v. Bauer, 266 S.W.3d 887, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1575, 2008 WL 4707360 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The defendant tenants, Timothy and Catherine Bauer, appeal pro se the judgment entered by the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis in favor of the plaintiff landlord, OMR Corporation. Because the tenants’ claims are not preserved for our review, we affirm the trial court’s judgment.

An opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided *888 with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision.

The trial court’s judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b)(5).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI