OMR CORPORATION v. Bauer

266 S.W.3d 887, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1575, 2008 WL 4707360
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided October 28, 2008·No. ED 90541·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The defendant tenants, Timothy and Catherine Bauer, appeal pro se the judgment entered by the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis in favor of the plaintiff landlord, OMR Corporation. Because the tenants’ claims are not preserved for our review, we affirm the trial court’s judgment.

An opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided *888 with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision.

The trial court’s judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b)(5).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OMR CORPORATION v. Bauer, 266 S.W.3d 887, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1575, 2008 WL 4707360 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).

266 S.W.3d 887 (OMR CORPORATION v. Bauer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Szymula v. Pine Cedars, Inc.
266 S.W.3d 887 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2008)