OMR CORPORATION v. Bauer
Opinion
ORDER
The defendant tenants, Timothy and Catherine Bauer, appeal pro se the judgment entered by the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis in favor of the plaintiff landlord, OMR Corporation. Because the tenants’ claims are not preserved for our review, we affirm the trial court’s judgment.
An opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided *888 with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision.
The trial court’s judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b)(5).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
266 S.W.3d 887 (OMR CORPORATION v. Bauer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.