Szuch v. State
This text of 780 So. 2d 290 (Szuch v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
John SZUCH, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
*291 Kimberly S. Daise of Kimberly S. Daise, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Joseph A. Tringali, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
The order denying appellant's post-conviction "Motion for Clarification of Applicability of 775.21" is hereby affirmed. Affirmance is without prejudice to appellant to file a separate civil suit seeking injunctive or declaratory relief from his sexual predator designation and the inclusion of information about his 1993 offenses on the Florida Department of Law Enforcement website. See, Connor v. State, 773 So.2d 1242 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000); Trovillo v. Florida Dept. of Law Enforcement, 762 So.2d 1038 (Fla. 5th DCA 2000).
DELL, STEVENSON and SHAHOOD, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
780 So. 2d 290, 2001 WL 246023, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/szuch-v-state-fladistctapp-2001.