Connor v. State
773 So. 2d 1242, 2000 WL 1816722
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 13, 2000·No. 4D00-3558·Published·Cited by 6 cases
Opinion
Clinton Wayne CONNOR, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Clinton Wayne Connor, Jasper, pro se.
No appearance required for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
The order denying appellant's post-conviction motions is hereby affirmed. Affirmance is without prejudice to appellant to file a separate civil suit seeking injunctive or declaratory relief from his sexual predator designation. See, Trovillo v. Florida Dept. of Law Enforcement, 762 So.2d 1038 (Fla. 5th DCA 2000); Angell v. State, 712 So.2d 1132 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998).
WARNER, C.J., GUNTHER and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Connor v. State, 773 So. 2d 1242, 2000 WL 1816722 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).
773 So. 2d 1242 (Connor v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Saintelien v. State
990 So. 2d 494 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2008)
Smith v. State
964 So. 2d 821 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2007)
Boyer v. State
946 So. 2d 75 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)
Saintelien v. State
937 So. 2d 234 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)
King v. State
911 So. 2d 229 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)
Szuch v. State
780 So. 2d 290 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)