Szold v. Outlet Embroidery Supply Co.

303 U.S. 623, 82 L. Ed. 1086
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided March 7, 1938·No. No. 427·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam:

As it appears, after hearing argument, that no substantial federal question is involved, the appeal is dismissed. (1) Dent v. West Virginia, 129 U. S. 114, 122, 123; Watson v. Maryland, 218 U. S. 173, 176, 177; Semler v. Dental Examiners, 294 U. S. 608, 611, 612; (2) Second Employers’ Liability Cases, 223 U. S. 1, 52; New York Central R. Co. v. White, 243 U. S. 188, 207; (3) Liebermann v. Van De Carr, 199 U. S. 552, 562; Douglas v. Noble, 261 U. S. 165, 168, 169; Highland Farms Dairy v. Agnew, 300 U. S. 608, 612.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Szold v. Outlet Embroidery Supply Co., 303 U.S. 623, 82 L. Ed. 1086 (1938).

303 U.S. 623 (Szold v. Outlet Embroidery Supply Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Shepard v. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance
368 P.2d 19 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1962)
Wheeler v. Kaiser
45 F. Supp. 937 (W.D. Missouri, 1942)
Groseclose v. Plummer
106 F.2d 311 (Ninth Circuit, 1939)