Szapor v. City of Cape Canaveral

775 So. 2d 1016, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 507, 2001 WL 60697
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 26, 2001·No. 5D00-1181·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

775 So.2d 1016 (2001)

Ernest F. SZAPOR, Appellant,
v.
CITY OF CAPE CANAVERAL, etc., Appellee.

No. 5D00-1181.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

January 26, 2001.

Albert S. Lagano, Melbourne, for Appellant.

Michael J. Roper, Ernest H. Kohlmyer, III, of Bell, Leeper & Roper, P.A., for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the summary judgment determining that the appellant is barred from bringing an action in inverse condemnation because the applicable four year statute of limitations has expired. The appellant filed his action in 1996, but knew of the appellee's invasion of his legal rights in 1989 or 1990. See Fla.Stat. § 95.111(3)(p) (1996); Sarasota Welfare Home, Inc. v. City of Sarasota, 666 So.2d 171 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995).

AFFIRMED.

SHARP, W., PETERSON and PALMER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Szapor v. City of Cape Canaveral, 775 So. 2d 1016, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 507, 2001 WL 60697 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

775 So. 2d 1016 (Szapor v. City of Cape Canaveral) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

New Testament Baptist Church v. DOT
993 So. 2d 112 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2008)
Suarez v. City of Tampa
987 So. 2d 681 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2008)