Szapor v. City of Cape Canaveral
This text of 775 So. 2d 1016 (Szapor v. City of Cape Canaveral) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Ernest F. SZAPOR, Appellant,
v.
CITY OF CAPE CANAVERAL, etc., Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
Albert S. Lagano, Melbourne, for Appellant.
Michael J. Roper, Ernest H. Kohlmyer, III, of Bell, Leeper & Roper, P.A., for Appellee.
PER CURIAM.
We affirm the summary judgment determining that the appellant is barred from bringing an action in inverse condemnation because the applicable four year statute of limitations has expired. The appellant filed his action in 1996, but knew of the appellee's invasion of his legal rights in 1989 or 1990. See Fla.Stat. § 95.111(3)(p) (1996); Sarasota Welfare Home, Inc. v. City of Sarasota, 666 So.2d 171 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995).
AFFIRMED.
SHARP, W., PETERSON and PALMER, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
775 So. 2d 1016, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 507, 2001 WL 60697, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/szapor-v-city-of-cape-canaveral-fladistctapp-2001.