System One Information Management, L.L.C. v. Incentive Connection Travel, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

System One Information Management, L.L.C. v. Incentive Connection Travel, Inc.

693 So. 2d 1092, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 5588, 1997 WL 269196

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 16, 1997·No. No. 97-1268·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We find no abuse of discretion in the entry of a temporary injunction and the order denying a motion to dissolve same. See Daoud v. City of Miami Beach, 145 Fla. 449,199 So. 582 (1941); Wise v. Schmidek, 649 So.2d 336 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995). This affirmance, however, is without prejudice to the appellant (defendant in the trial court) seeking an increase in the amount of the injunction bond.¹ See Parker Tampa Two, Inc. v. Somerset Dev. Corp., 544 So.2d 1018 (Fla.1989).

Affirmed without prejudice.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We find no abuse of discretion in the entry of a temporary injunction and the order denying a motion to dissolve same. See Daoud v. City of Miami Beach, 145 Fla. 449,199 So. 582 (1941); Wise v. Schmidek, 649 So.2d 336 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995). This affirmance, however, is without prejudice to the appellant (defendant in the trial court) seeking an increase in the amount of the injunction bond.¹ See Parker Tampa Two, Inc. v. Somerset Dev. Corp., 544 So.2d 1018 (Fla.1989).

Affirmed without prejudice.

System One Information Management, L.L.C. v. Incentive Connection Travel, Inc., 693 So. 2d 1092, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 5588, 1997 WL 269196 (Fla. Ct. App. 1997).

Pincite

693 So. 2d 1092 (System One Information Management, L.L.C. v. Incentive Connection Travel, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related