Home/Federal Circuit/Synopsys, Inc. v. Mentor Graphics Corporation

Synopsys, Inc. v. Mentor Graphics Corporation

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Synopsys, Inc. v. Mentor Graphics Corporation. Read the opinion of the Court — 839 F.3d 1138 →
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit·Decided October 11, 2016·No. 15-2056·Unpublished

Opinion

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________

SYNOPSYS, INC., Appellant

v.

MENTOR GRAPHICS CORPORATION, Appellee ______________________

2015-2056 ______________________

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2014- 00287. ______________________

JUDGMENT ______________________

ERIC SHUMSKY, Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP, Washington, DC, argued for appellant. Also represented by JEREMY PETERMAN; TRAVIS JENSEN, ANTHONY TARTAGLIO, Menlo Park, CA; BRIAN PHILIP GOLDMAN, San Francisco, CA.

ANDREW M. MASON, Klarquist Sparkman, LLP, Port- land, OR, argued for appellee. Also represented by JEFFREY S. LOVE, JOHN D. VANDENBERG. ______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (NEWMAN, CLEVENGER, and DYK, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

October 11, 2016 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Synopsys, Inc. v. Mentor Graphics Corporation, (Fed. Cir. 2016).

Synopsys, Inc. v. Mentor Graphics Corporation (Synopsys, Inc. v. Mentor Graphics Corporation) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.