Synclair v. County of Fresno

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided June 1, 2006·No. 03-16910·Published

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

LARRY SYNCLAIR, SR., individually  and as a parent of Larry Synclair, Jr., a minor, Plaintiff-Appellant, No. 03-16910 v. COUNTY OF FRESNO; DEPARTMENT OF  D.C. No. CV-01-06546-AWI CHILD ABDUCTION UNIT; WILLIAM ORDER FRANK; RON HOPPER; DENNIS LEWIS; EDWARD HUNT; KATHY MACKIE, Defendants-Appellees.  On Remand from the United States Supreme Court

Filed June 2, 2006

Before: Alfred T. Goodwin, J. Clifford Wallace, and Stephen S. Trott, Circuit Judges

ORDER

On petition for writ of certiorari, the United States Supreme Court vacated and remanded the memorandum disposition “for further consideration in light of Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Saudi Basic Industries Corp., 544 U.S. [280], 125 S.Ct. 1517, 161 L.Ed2d 454 (2005).” Synclair v. County of Fresno, 126 S.Ct. 731 (Nov. 28, 2005).

We remand to the district court for further proceedings con- sistent with the direction of the Supreme Court.

6013 PRINTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE—U.S. COURTS BY THOMSON/WEST—SAN FRANCISCO

The summary, which does not constitute a part of the opinion of the court, is copyrighted © 2006 Thomson/West.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Synclair v. County of Fresno, (9th Cir. 2006).

Synclair v. County of Fresno (Synclair v. County of Fresno) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Saudi Basic Industries Corp.
544 U.S. 280 (Supreme Court, 2005)
Synclair v. Fresno County
546 U.S. 1027 (Supreme Court, 2005)